Are We Robots?
As a prequel to the topic of this blog I would like to make reference to the Pink Floyd song 'Welcome To The Machine' from their classic 'Wish You Were Here' album. The main premise of the song is that we are all part of a well oiled machine, a factory processing unit where we are but a cog in that process. Our life revolving around the repetition of life/work and so on, whilst the company we are working for makes huge profits. So with this view in mind read on as I look at if we are robots or not...
Over the past thirty years there has been something of an
underground revolution going on. It is a
revolution that has not required guns, bombs or even covert operations by elite
militia. It has not required UN Peace Keeping
forces and it is not religion based. By
and large this revolution has been under the radar of the media. In fact, the only time that you would have
heard about it would have been through industry related forums and
workshops. Even though this revolution
was borne out of good intentions, it has become clear that there is a potential
dark side to it as well.
So what is this mysterious revolution? Well, this is the revolution of business
efficiency.
Over the last three decades businesses worldwide have been
looking at ways to make processes more efficient. By efficient I am really talking about
minimising errors, making the process simpler and, of course, making the
product or service cheaper (or should I say more profitable). After all, if you eliminate errors you will
save money on your production costs. For
a large number of industries (think the car industry) it can make sense to
streamline production. That way, at
every stage of the evolution of the construction of the car you can easily monitor
its quality as well as being able to pinpoint where any defect or error has
occurred.
Business efficiency has become a science as well. There are a number of theories and worldwide
standards that can help businesses and employees alike. One is Six Sigma which some of you may be
aware of. Six Sigma, for the
uninitiated, is a set of tools, techniques and strategies used for process
improvement. It was originally developed
by Motorola in 1985. Since then it has
been implemented by a large number of companies worldwide.
Another efficiency tool is Prince 2. This is used for project management purposes
and covers the management, control and organisation of a project. Somewhat surprisingly this was developed by a
UK government agency in 1989. It is now
seen as one of the global industry standards for projects across all industries.
There are many more theories and concepts aside from the two
I have mentioned above. A quick internet
search will provide a plethora of different ideals for business improvement.
From a different angle it could be argued that all business
processes that follow these concepts have, in fact, morphed into factory
processing lines. Without a doubt for
some this is a good approach (again, think the car industry). For other industries it does take away the
‘organic’ thinking that is important for the good or service being developed. This lack of ‘organic’ thinking has, in my
opinion, impacted workers. Nowadays employees
who are utilising Six Sigma, for example, may not always see what the overall
end result will be.
They may also not be able to think ‘outside the square’ clearly
which is a very important element not only in business, but also for the growth
of us as humans. It could be argued that
after three decades of the implementation of these concepts that we are turning
into human robots. Robots that are
unable to compute anything outside of their immediate vicinity.
Recently, I came across this on a project that I have been
working on for 12 months. An issue arose
that required input from a number of people as to the best way for resolving
it. However, some of the project team
had trouble coming up with a required solution.
Their view was that all the boxes had been checked from their
partitioned view, and therefore, all was fine.
They could not grasp what the ‘Big Picture’ was. It actually took a few phone calls, emails
and time to resolve this issue.
Now Sir Richard Branson is certainly not one to get bogged
down with theories and concepts. Aside
from any regulatory requirements he utilises an organic and consultative
approach to business and issues. I
remember reading that he normally makes decisions based on his gut feeling
rather than spending many hours researching.
I think it is safe to say that Sir Richard has had a fairly successful
career adopting this approach! I am also
sure that he surrounds himself with like-minded people (I am still awaiting a
call from Sir Richard – hint, hint).
My worry is that as we improve technology then more and more
business concepts and theories will be introduced. This could well lead to less ‘thinking
outside the square’ situations.
Probably the best way ahead is to combine both business efficiency
processes with organic thinking. We must
ensure that all workers and employees are fully aware of what the end picture
is. Until we do this we run the risk of
us all turning into human robots.
Remember, that we must always look at the end result. That is the good or service that we are
supplying to our customers is the correct one.
This may require more of the ‘grey matter’ inside our heads rather than
any process.
Comments